N25m Abuja Property: Court orders judge to open his defence

Date:

By Vivian Okejeme, Abuja

 

A Federal Capital Territory High Court, Maitama has ordered Justice Jeremiah, a serving judge of the National Industrial Court, NIC, to enter his defence to a N25million property case that was instituted against him by an Abuja based estate surveyor.

The complainant, a surveyor, Mr. James Olobo, in his Writ of Summons marked CV/950/2021, alleged that the Defendant, forcefully took possession of his property situated at Primasset estate, Lugbe, Abuja.

Counsel to Olobo, Mr. Ataguba Aboje, told the court that the Defendant had by a written contract of sale that was executed on May 4, 2020, agreed to purchase his 450sqm land together with a 4-bedroom fully detached duplex carcass for the sum of N25m.

According to him, it was an express term of the agreement that the Defendant must complete payment for the property, on or before the end of November 2020.

“That on May 4, 2020, in pursuance of the Agreement, the Defendant paid a deposit of N20million out of the said purchase price to the Claimant’s solicitor’s account as agent and not a stakeholder.

“It was an express term of the Agreement that the balance of the purchase price of N5m was to be paid in four instalments to the Claimant”.

READ MORE  HMCAN commends Buhari, NHIA, NASS, others over passing NHIA Act 2022 into law

The Claimant told the court that contrary to the contract of sale, the Defendant, paid in only N500, 000. 00 before the agreement elapsed, and thereafter, forcefully took possession of the property.

In his statement of claim before the court, the Claimant, stated: “That about the 13th of November, 2020, the Claimant discovered that the Defendant had taken possession of the property and was busy altering the property significantly.

“The Claimant met several workmen working on the instruction of the Defendant and had to stop them from working. This was contrary to the Agreement as possession was agreed to occur only upon completion of payment and not before.

“The Claimant states that he contacted the Defendant to protest his trespass but he became abusive and threatened the Claimant not to interfere with his workmen and not to trespass at his property”.

The Claimant told the court that owing to refusal of the Defendant to complete the payment within the stipulated period, the purchase Agreement was terminated, with a cheque issued for a full refund of the monies that were paid through his solicitor’s account.

READ MORE  Dismiss Atiku, PDP’s petition, Buhari prays tribunal

“Nearly two months after the Defendant received the Claimant’s letter and the bank drafts, the Defendant returned then to the Claimant’s solicitor’s office on February 26, 2021, using a courier company called Speedaf.

“The Defendant remains adamant that he is entitled to the Property and continues to exercise ownership rights over it unlawfully.

“The Defendant’s attitude to the Claimant despite his infractions is that he occupies a privileged and protected position as a judicial officer, a judge of a superior court of record and there is little or nothing the Claimant can do to him for the breach of the Agreement.

“Claimant states that on one occasion about February 23, 2021, while he was in the estate minding his business, the Defendant confronted him aggressively in the presence of several persons and abused him and called him a ‘bastard’.

“He also taunted him saying ‘if you are a man come and collect the property, I am waiting for you’.

“The Claimant states that after the termination of the Agreement he attempted to repossess the property from the Defendant and advertised it for sale to other prospective buyers but the Defendant refused to allow it and continues to scare away potential buyers.

READ MORE  Yuguda reiterates commitment to improve welfare of IDPs

“He falsely reported the matter to the Police claiming that the Claimant criminally trespassed on his property and beat up his workmen in the bid to frustrate the sale of the Property to another buyer”.

Consequently, the Claimant, is among other things, praying the court for; “A declaration that the Defendant’s forceful take over and alteration of the Claimant’s property without an agreement or conveyance, amounts to trespass.

“An order awarding N50m against the Defendant for trespass.

“An order awarding N30m as general damages for breach of contract

“An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant from interfering with the Claimant’s title and rights over the property.

As well as, “An order pursuant to Order 39 of the FCT High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 awarding 30% interest per annum on the judgement sums from the date of judgement until it is paid”.

Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

City Boy Movement appoints Balami as executive board member, national director on special duty

The City Boy Movement has appointed aviation entrepreneur and...

Uber to lay off 3,000 staff in global restructuring amid Nigeria, Uganda exit

Uber says it is cutting more than 3,000 jobs...

Radda Pledges General Hospital for Danja

Radda Pledges General Hospital for Danja     Katsina State Governor, Malam...

Kebbi: Commissioner Tasks Media Aides in Yauri on Aggressive Publicity 

Kebbi: Commissioner Tasks Media Aides in Yauri on Aggressive...