Emeka Ike’s published data not classified, sensitive – INEC

Date:

By Vivian Okejeme

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has told a Federal High Court, in Abuja, that issue complained of in the suit filed by NDC House of Representatives aspirant and Nollywood Actor, Emeka Ike, was neither classified, sensitive nor confidential information.

The defendant submitted that the electoral body has the “statutorily and constitutional function/power to make available information of its voters to the general public without the consent of any registered voter.”

In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1272/2026, the Nollywood actor and politician is suing INEC and Lere Olayinka, media aide to Nyesom Wike, minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

He is seeking N10 billion against INEC and Olayinka for alleged violation of his fundamental right to privacy.

Emeka Ike, had through his counsel, Leonard Adeh, prayed the court to declare that Olayinka’s decision to publish his database on X without his approval “amounts to gross breach and violation of the applicant’s fundamental right to privacy and the protection of personal data”.

In his counter affidavit through his counsel, Akpama Ekwe, Olayinka that the only information contained in the document he published was the Applicant’s name, and passport photograph, and that the information was already in the public domain.

READ MORE  We’ve neutralized 140 bandits, arrested 171 linked to Gana -Commander

He said in the counter affidavit that “contrary to paragraph 6 of the Applicants supporting Affidavit the information published by the 1st Respondent (Lere Olayinka) was already in the public domain and was not accessed through any unlawful neans.

“That contrary to paragraph 8 of the Applicant’s Supporting Affidavit, the 1st Respondent does not owe the Applicant any duty of care and confidentiality and does not require the consent of the Applicant to publish the Applicant’s
name and passport photograph that was already in the public domain.

“That contrary to paragraph 10 of the Supporting Affidavit, the Applicant who brought himself to contest election into the Federal House of Representatives, cannot be traumatized by the circulation of his name and passport photograph
which he personally presented to the public when seeking to contest election, and as a Nollywood star.

“That information supplied in voters card is not private data because by the provision of Section 19(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026, ‘the Commission shall, not latter than 90 days to a general election, appoint a period of seven days during which a copy of the voters register for each Local Government, Area
Council or Ward shall be displayed or published for public scrutiny at every registration area and on its official website or every registration area and on its official website or any website established by the Commission for that purpose.’

READ MORE  Alleged court contempt: Judge threatens to jail IGP, Alkali Baba

“That contrary to paragraph 11 of the Applicant’s Supporting Affidavit, the only information contained in the document published by the 1st Respondent was the Applicant’s name, and passport photograph.”

In its own counter affidavit, INEC which is the second respondent in the suit averred that “In response to paragraph 5 of the Applicant’s Originating Motion, the 2nd Respondent statutory responsibility includes the compilation,
maintenance, display, publication, certification and management of the register of voters in accordance with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the Electoral Act 2026, and the National Data Protection Act 2023.

“That the 2nd Respondent has the Statutorily and Constitutional function/power to make available information of its voters to the general public without the consent of any registered voter.

READ MORE  Aviation Safety: Senate absolves indigenous airline

“That the issue complained of is not classified, sensitive nor confidential and that such information are displayed and published in accordance with the Electoral Act 2026.

“That what is alleged to be posted by the 1st Respondent on his X platform did not emanate from the 2nd Respondent.

“That the 2nd Respondent, as a Data Controller, has never breached its statutory duty of care, custody and protection of personal voter information and data, it owes the Applicant and other Voters under its secured portal and restricted database.”

Meantime, the matter is adjourned till October 12, 2026, for hearing.

Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Reps Push National Drone Policy to Boost Local Defence Production, Fight Insecurity

The House of Representatives has called for the development...

Fubara backs Kingsley Chinda as successor

Siminalayi Fubara, governor of Rivers, has declared his...

Peller, Jarvis share pre-wedding photos

Ahead of their highly publicised wedding, Amadou Elizabeth, the...

HURIWA Supports DSS Appeal Against Life Sentence for Convicted Ansaru Commanders

The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has...