Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, says the Nigerian constitution does not expressly confer power on the President to assume or temporarily displace executive or legislative institutions of a state.
Falana made this known in an interview on Arise Television.
He was reacting to the Supreme Court judgment, which reaffirmed that the President holds the constitutional power to declare a state of emergency in any state where circumstances threaten public safety or governance.
He said: “Unlike the constitutions of India and Pakistan, the Nigerian Constitution does not expressly confer power on the President to assume or temporarily displace executive or legislative institutions of a state.
“Well, I think in fairness to the Supreme Court, the justice that delivered the leading judgment, did send out what is regarded as summary judgment.
“Unfortunately, most commentators have not bothered to read the judgment. Yes, there is no doubt that the court did say or did confirm the power of the President to adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order in any state where a state of emergency has been declared.
“There was no doubt before now that the President could deploy forces or take other steps to restore law and order.
“What has always been controversy is the extent of the powers, and the Supreme Court made the point that the provision of the Constitution, section 305, has not set out the extent of the powers that the president can exercise.”
Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.
