Alleged cybercrime: Court adjourns Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan‘s trial

Date:

The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, adjourned the trial of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for alleged cybercrime until Feb. 4, 2026.

The matter, which was fixed for today by Justice Mohammed Umar, could not proceed due to the judge’s absence.

The case was, however, fixed for Feb. 4, 2025 for commencement of trial

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the matter also, on Oct. 21, did not hold due to the protest organised by Mr Omoyele Sowore to demand the release of Nnamdi Kanu, who was recently convicted on terrorism offences.

Justice Umar had, on Sept. 22, fixed Oct. 21 for the hearing after the trial was stalled owing to an objection raised by the defendant.

READ MORE  Kebbi celebrates democracy day

Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar.

She was granted bail, following which Justice Umar adjourned till Sept. 22 for the commencement of trial.

However on the last adjourned date when the prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe, was about to open his case by calling the 1st witness, the defence lawyer raised an objection.

The development was after a television screen had been mounted in the courtroom preparatory to the commencement of proceedings.

The defence lawyer, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, had expressed concern about the possibility of the prosecution opening its case.

West-Idahosa told the court that a notice of preliminary objection to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case had already been filed.

READ MORE  June 12: Repeat the 1993 credible election in 2027 — Peter Obi charges INEC

He said the objection is not to the nature of the charge, but the alleged abuse of the prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

The lawyer also complained about not being served with copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

Although Kaswe argued that the objection filed by the defendant should not be allowed to stall the court’s business for the day, Justice Umar insisted that the prosecution must first respond to the objection.

The judge said he intended to first determine the objection raised by the defence before taking any further steps in the case.

READ MORE  ODI applauds BPP DG, others for reforms

Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, is alleged to have transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite and endanger lives and breach public order.

The senator was alleged to have, while addressing a gathering on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi, accused the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, of instructing ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi to have her killed in the state.

She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate president and former governor plotted to kill her in Kogi.

The charge is brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Customs pays N7.61bn retirement benefits to 4,237 retirees

Mariam Abeeb The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) has released...

CSJ queries N34tn customs duty waivers

Mariam Abeeb A Non- governmental Organisation under the aegis of...

NECO dismisses Kogi’s ‘Miracle Centre’ claim

Mariam Abeeb The National Examinations Council (NECO) has rejected the...

FUDMA to Host Nine Universities For Pre-NUGA Games 

FUDMA to Host Nine Universities For Pre-NUGA Games  The Federal...