Alleged cybercrime: Court adjourns Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan‘s trial

Date:

The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, adjourned the trial of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for alleged cybercrime until Feb. 4, 2026.

The matter, which was fixed for today by Justice Mohammed Umar, could not proceed due to the judge’s absence.

The case was, however, fixed for Feb. 4, 2025 for commencement of trial

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the matter also, on Oct. 21, did not hold due to the protest organised by Mr Omoyele Sowore to demand the release of Nnamdi Kanu, who was recently convicted on terrorism offences.

Justice Umar had, on Sept. 22, fixed Oct. 21 for the hearing after the trial was stalled owing to an objection raised by the defendant.

Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar.

READ MORE  Rivers crisis: I can never be intimidated by anybody, Wike boasts

She was granted bail, following which Justice Umar adjourned till Sept. 22 for the commencement of trial.

However on the last adjourned date when the prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe, was about to open his case by calling the 1st witness, the defence lawyer raised an objection.

The development was after a television screen had been mounted in the courtroom preparatory to the commencement of proceedings.

The defence lawyer, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, had expressed concern about the possibility of the prosecution opening its case.

West-Idahosa told the court that a notice of preliminary objection to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case had already been filed.

He said the objection is not to the nature of the charge, but the alleged abuse of the prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

READ MORE  2024: Police arrest 715 criminals, prosecute 292 offenders in Adamawa

The lawyer also complained about not being served with copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

Although Kaswe argued that the objection filed by the defendant should not be allowed to stall the court’s business for the day, Justice Umar insisted that the prosecution must first respond to the objection.

The judge said he intended to first determine the objection raised by the defence before taking any further steps in the case.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, is alleged to have transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite and endanger lives and breach public order.

READ MORE  Buhari appoints AIG Garba Baba Umar as Adviser on security

The senator was alleged to have, while addressing a gathering on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi, accused the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, of instructing ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi to have her killed in the state.

She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate president and former governor plotted to kill her in Kogi.

The charge is brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024.

Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Adebayo’s federalism gamble: States to become development engines, not Abuja’s dependants

Presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party, SDP, for...

Marks inaigurates ADC reconciliation committee, begs aggrieved members to give peace a chance

By Lateef Ibrahim, Abuja Ahead of the next year's general...

Turaki-led PDP mourns death of Dan Orbih

  By Lateef Ibrahim, Abuja The National Chairman of the Interim...

Wike rules out Atiku victory in 2027

By Stanley Onyekwere The Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom...