Canada has announced counter-tariffs as high as 50% on a range of US goods in retaliation to the latest wave of levies on Canadian imports imposed by President Donald Trump last weekend.
The Canadian tariffs will apply to nearly C$28bn ($20bn; £15bn) worth of American products, ranging from steel to furniture, fresh tuna and cotton T-shirts, officials announced on Tuesday.
The list of targeted products is designed to match Canadian goods hit by the US. The Canadian levies are set to come into effect on 8 September.
It is the latest escalation after US-Canada trade talks collapsed late last week, with each side accusing the other of making last-minute demands that were unreasonable.
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said that Canada’s retaliation is in response to 50% tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on a range of Canadian goods after trade talks fell apart on Friday.
“Those tariffs will have real consequences for Canadian workers, businesses and communities across our nation,” he said. “Canada must respond.”
Champagne characterised Canada’s retaliation as “proportionate” and “strategic”.
He added that Canada will also offer businesses and workers impacted by US tariffs an additional C$7.5bn for support programmes designed to minimise job losses and keep companies afloat.
Placing taxes on trade between what are historically two of the world’s closest trading partners will undoubtedly lead to pain on both sides of the border.
Supply chains which have been developed over decades are set to see increased trading costs due the latest tariff announcements made from both the US and Canada, ultimately hitting businesses of all sizes and consumers through potentially higher prices.
Polls suggest the majority of Canadians support their government in holding firm against the US.
But some questions remain on exactly why trade talks fell apart, with the Conservative opposition asking that the full text of the draft deal with the US be released.
Businesses have also expressed concerns about the impact of a prolonged trade war with Canada’s largest trading partner.
The White House released a statement after Canada announced its counter-tariffs, saying that the US was prepared to offer Canada “the most preferential market access of any country on Earth” in recent trade talks.
“Instead of partnership, Canada chose unreasonable demands, walk-backs, and flat-out rejection,” it said.
In a series of Tuesday posts on Truth Social, Trump also accused Canada of “ripping off” the US for decades and of charging American farmers steep tariffs.
“I deal with many countries, and Canada is easily the most difficult and unreasonable,” Trump wrote. “They feel entitled, but they are not a State, and will be entitled no longer!”
He suggested that he will change the name of Lake Ontario, one of the Great Lakes on the US-Canada border, to Lake America, writing: “We don’t expect to doing much business with Ontario any longer.”
Trump threatened this week to hike US tariffs on Canadian automobiles to 50% as of 1 January.
Prime Minister Mark Carney responded by accusing Trump of wanting to “destroy” Canadian industries including the automobile manufacturing and steel and aluminum sectors.
Public rhetoric on both sides reached a fever pitch on Monday, but some officials struck a more diplomatic tone on Tuesday with hopes that talks could be resumed.
After calling Trump a “loser” on Monday at a news conference, Ontario Premier Doug Ford acknowledged in an interview with CNN that “things got a little heated”.
“But I want to make a deal — a good deal for the American people, a good deal for Canadians,” Ford said.
The escalation also puts into question the future of a North American free trade pact between Canada, the US and Mexico called the USMCA.
President Claudia Sheinbaum had despatched her economy secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, to Washington for emergency talks after trade negotiations collapsed with Canada.
Canada’s retaliation tests the limit of American power under Trump
Two days before US-Canada trade talks dramatically derailed, Vice-President JD Vance was telling an audience at a private fundraiser that Prime Minister Mark Carney was a “very sweet guy”.
In a private audio recording leaked to the Canadian Press, Vance reportedly went on to say that Carney “comes in and puffs his chest out and says: ‘I’m going to, like, out-tough Donald Trump.’”
He described that approach as “hilarious” because the Canadians ultimately “climb down on a lot of issues”.
Maybe those comments, which received considerable coverage in Canada, were not the proximate cause for Carney’s diplomats to pack up and go home over the weekend. But they certainly didn’t help.
Carney’s move abruptly terminated negotiations over a new trade agreement and sparked a fresh round of tariffs between neighbours who conduct more than $872bn (£640bn) in bilateral annual trade.
The serious and deepening rift – and Vance’s comments – offer the latest example of a Trump administration willing to exert force on the global stage against friend and foe alike, again highlighting the potentially disruptive consequences of such actions.
What’s more, if Trump thought the Canadians would cave in the face of American pressure – as many US allies have done over the past 19 months – he may have miscalculated. And the consequences of that mistake could linger for the rest of his presidency.
Why is Trump targeting Canada?
While the latest rupture is striking, friction between the US and Canada dates back to the first Trump administration and the negotiations that created the USMCA: the deal replacing the 1990s-era North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta).
Complicating matters were personal clashes between Trump and Justin Trudeau, who was then Canada’s prime minister. As Trump prepared to return to the White House in late 2024, he derisively referred to Trudeau as “governor” and to Canada as America’s “51st State.”
Underlying those insults was a geopolitical outlook that positioned the US primarily as a hemispheric power entitled to exert political, military, and economic influence over its immediate region – and that most definitely included Canada.
Administration officials viewed Canada as contributing too little to regional defence while disproportionately benefiting from trade with its southern neighbour.
In Trump’s worldview, where economic security and national security are inextricably linked, Canada and Mexico – two of America’s largest trading partners – became early, obvious targets.
It’s why the US president said he wanted to take over Greenland too.
“If you listen to really anybody in state, treasury, or commerce [departments], you will hear the phrase ‘economic security is national security’,” said Drew Delong, head of corporate statecraft at the Kearney Foresight think tank.
By the start of this year, however, as North American trade negotiations proceeded in fits and starts, Trump’s attention shifted away from Canada to his military interventions in Venezuela and then the Middle East.
Across every region, though, the core line of Trump’s international strategy remains consistent: the US is a dominant power capable of imposing its will for national benefit.
Trump’s power tested by Canada – and Iran
But power has limits. Trump’s second term has been a continuous test of those limits – and, at times, a lesson in finding exactly where they are.
While obvious differences exist between a shooting war in Iran and a trade dispute with Canada, the lessons are not dissimilar. In both, the US faces a counterpart that, despite having far less overall power, retains the means to retaliate.
For Iran, that leverage lies in targeting US allies and disrupting global commerce by threatening maritime chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz.
Canada, for its part, is beginning to test its own ability to inflict economic pain. Tuesday’s targeted tariffs mark a first step. Future measures could include restricting US access to Canadian energy and critical minerals, alongside consumer boycotts of American goods.
“As the broader world shifts into a more economic security theatre, you see this game of chokepoints and leverage angles continue to pan out across supply chains,” said DeLong. Countries just have to look for them, he added.
For the moment, clear exit ramps are scarce. Trump has escalated his rhetoric, repeatedly accusing Canada of “ripping off” the US, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford fired back by telling the American president to “kiss my ass”.
“Every time we push allies and partners away, I think we incentivise them to look for new relationships and new partnerships rather than trying to acquiesce to US demands,” said Imran Bayoumi, deputy director of the GeoStrategy Initiative at the Atlantic Council.
Still, room remains for cooler heads to prevail. Canada’s new tariffs take effect in two weeks, while the most significant US retaliation – a 50% tariff on Canadian-built vehicles and auto parts – will not kick in until early 2027.
As with any conflict – economic or military – a cycle of escalation can prove difficult to break. However, the multi-month buffer before the next wave of US tariffs gives negotiators space to restart talks. Until Friday night, these had been showing some progress.
A dilemma for Carney and Canada
A more pressing deadline is November’s US midterm elections. Democratic congressional victories could significantly curtail Trump’s authority – or unexpected Republican success could embolden him further.
At present, Ottawa seems content to bet on the former outcome, calculating that fear of a midterm blowout in key industrial battlegrounds like Michigan and Ohio will force Trump to back down before ballots are cast.
“I don’t think there’s the kind of internal political divisions in Canada that maybe the Trump administration would have expected,” Bayoumi said. “I think Carney has a lot of political runway to really get a good deal for Canada and not settle for anything less.”
Canada may continue shifting away from the US altogether, charting a course that deliberately widens the distance between the two nations. As Carney noted: “We cannot depend on traditional alliances when the rules of the game have fundamentally changed.”
While geographic proximity ensures the two countries will remain intertwined, the deeply integrated economic relationship of recent decades may be coming to an end.
In that respect, Canada presents a contrast with Mexico, which appears to be opting for even closer economic integration with the US. Meanwhile, other global trading partners – including US allies in Europe and Asia – are watching Canada’s “elbows up” resistance as a plausible blueprint for future dealings with Trump.
“Ten years from now, this is going to be taught in classrooms,” said DeLong. “You have these bifurcating paths within North America, and the question is: Are they going to come back together, or is this going to continue to split? And if it does, who benefits most in the long run?”
If the supposedly easygoing Canadians can stand up to their pugnacious – and powerful – neighbour, others may decide they can, too. Source: BBC
Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.
