Inaccurate Reporting on Military Operations Risks Undermining Counter-Terrorism Efforts – Advocacy Group

By Anan Geolengs

The Nigerian Advocates for Peace and Stability has warned that the spread of misinformation and premature narratives around recent security incidents could undermine ongoing counter-terrorism efforts.

The group cited two cases: the Boko Haram attacks on military formations in Buniyadi and Buni Gari, Yobe State, and allegations of civilian casualties during aerial operations in Kusasu, Katerma, Bokko, and Kuduru communities in Shiroro LGA, Niger State.

Conflicting casualty figures and unverified claims of suppressed operational information have circulated in sections of the media following the Yobe attacks. In Niger State, competing narratives emerged over civilian deaths linked to airstrikes targeting bandits. The Defence Headquarters has disputed the claims and said verification is ongoing.

The group said the timing of these reports is troubling, as the Armed Forces of Nigeria continue to record gains against Boko Haram, ISWAP, bandits, kidnappers, and other criminal groups across multiple theatres.

In a statement on Tuesday, Convener Ismail Abu said public scrutiny and media engagement are vital in a democracy. But he warned that unverified or sensational claims during active operations can create confusion, heighten public anxiety, and play into terrorist propaganda.

“This wave of misinformation is coming at a time when the military is intensifying pressure on terrorist groups and recording measurable successes. False or misleading narratives at such a critical point risk distracting from operations and emboldening enemies of the state,” Abu said.

“Misinformation during active operations can distort realities on the ground, weaken public confidence, embolden criminal groups, and compromise coordinated responses by security agencies,” he added.

Abu noted that terrorist groups often exploit information vacuums and viral content to manipulate public perception and damage troop morale. Premature reporting of casualty figures, troop movements, and intelligence activities can compromise sensitive operations and put civilians and personnel at risk, he said.

“Military operations are dynamic and intelligence-driven. The rush to publish unverified claims or amplify speculation can interfere with operations and undermine efforts to protect lives and communities.”

While reaffirming support for press freedom and accountability, the group stressed the need for responsible crisis reporting based on verification, context, and professional ethics.

It urged journalists, civil society groups, content creators, and the public to verify sensitive security information through credible channels and avoid amplifying claims that escalate fear or serve extremist objectives.

“The fight against terrorism is not only fought on the battlefield; it is also fought in the information space. At a time when troops are confronting terrorists and bandits across multiple theatres, responsible communication is a collective national responsibility,” the statement concluded.