Relocation policy violates our fundamental human rights – FCT indigenes

…Demand Integration and Justice

By Christiana Ekpa

The Indigenes of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Wednesday strongly opposed the long-standing relocation policy adopted by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), describing it as a violation of their fundamental human rights and the rule of law.

This was just as the FCT citizen demanded  inclusive urban renewal and integration approach  that will fosters acceptance, comfort, and provides humane and equitable alternatives.

Their position was made known during a public hearing organized by the House of Representatives Committee on Area Councils and Ancillary Matters, held at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja, on Tuesday.

Declaring the hearing open, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Tajudeen Abbas, urged stakeholders to freely express their views, noting that such contributions would assist lawmakers in crafting informed legislation. Abbas, who was represented by Hon. Joe Oke Onuakalusi, described the intervention as a critical step towards promoting national unity and the brotherhood embedded in Nigeria’s constitution and national anthem.

He noted that the issue of integrating FCT indigenes has been a recurring debate across successive administrations, emphasizing that the matter is not just relevant to Abuja but has broader implications for justice and equity across the country.

Chairman of the House Committee on Area Councils and Ancillary Matters, Hon. Fredrick Agbedi, explained that the hearing was prompted by a motion earlier moved on the need to explore alternative approaches to resettling or integrating both indigenous and non-indigenous residents in the FCT.

“The FCT is a symbol of unity and a representation of our national ideals. It was built for all Nigerians, irrespective of ethnic, religious, or regional backgrounds,” he said. “However, with growth and diversity come complex challenges—including the displacement of indigenous communities, the unclear status of non-indigenous residents, and the tension between customary land rights and modern urban planning.”