Reps clash over clause 16 of Electoral Amendment bill

Date:

By Christiana Ekpa and Umar Mohammad Puma

Members of the House of Representatives yesterday clashed over clause 16 Electoral amendment bill.
The bone of contention was the section of the in the Claus 16 which had to do with the card reader.
As soon as the Chairman of the Committee on Electoral and Political Party Matters, Hon. Aishatu Dukku read the motion, presiding officer, Yusuf Lasun informed the House of the importance of the bill and demanded for their prompt attention.
Recall that President Mohammadu Buhari had declined ascent to the bill pointing out some issues which necessitated the effort of the lawmakers to take another look at it.
The Clause indicates that the presiding officer shall use a smart card reader or any other technological device that may be prescribed by the Commission for accreditation of voters, to verify, confirm or authenticate particulars of the voter in the manner prescribed by the Commission.
Hon. Gabriel-Africa Onyenweife from Anambra and Dan Asuquo from Cross River State were as well as Hon. Nicholas Ossai from Delta State were among the contributors who kicked against the inclusion of the clause ‘any other technological device that may be prescribed by the Commission’ saying it will give the electoral body the room to change the process when it suits it.
But Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila from Lagos State advised that the clause was necessary because it will leave the electoral body the opportunity to introduce any other technological device to conduct elections without recourse the the National Assembly for another amendment.
Similarly, where the card reader fails to function, the presiding officer is expected to replace it within three hours to the end of voting. Where that is not possible, the electoral body will conduct a fresh election within 24 hours.
Also Clause 17 says that where nomination of an elected is nullified by the Court and a notice of appeal against the decision is given within the stipulated period for appeal, the elected candidate shall not withstanding the contrary decision of the Court remain in office pending the determination of the the appeal.
Going by the new law, it is now an offence for any political party to present an unqualified candidate to the Commission and where that happens, the erring party shall pay a fine of N5 million naira.
The Clause 18 further stipulated that the Commission shall electronic voting in all elections or any other method of voting as may be determined by the Commission from time to time.

READ MORE  Defection: Ribadu insignificant to APC - Lawan

After the Deputy Speaker who presided over the session put the matter
to a voice vote and ruled in favour of the amendment, some Peoples
Democratic Party (PDP) members who opposed it left the chambers.

Never miss a moment! Get the stories shaping Nigeria, delivered straight to your phone. Follow Peoplesdaily Newspaper on WhatsApp for breaking news, exclusive reports, and the headlines everyone will be talking about, before anyone else.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Tragedy: 9-Year-Old Sets Family Home Ablaze, Four Relatives Dead

From Muhammad Maitela, Damaturu   The Yobe State Police Command has...

Shettima pushes food, nutrition bill to protect funding

Vice President Kashim Shettima has said Nigeria will accelerate...

First Niger bridge: Works Ministry denies removing demarcations

The Federal Ministry of Works has denied reports that...

2027: 84% Nigerians willing to vote despite insecurity, distrust

No fewer than 84 per cent of Nigerians are...